KWR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Century Aluminum has a net margin of 2.92% compared to Quaker Houghton's net margin of 4.69%. Quaker Houghton's return on equity of 6.76% beat Century Aluminum's return on equity of 18.99%.

Quaker Houghton has a consensus price target of $146.00, signalling upside risk potential of 27.53%. On the other hand Century Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $22.67 which suggests that it could grow by 31.94%. Given that Century Aluminum has higher upside potential than Quaker Houghton, analysts believe Century Aluminum is more attractive than Quaker Houghton.

Quaker Houghton has a beta of 1.382, which suggesting that the stock is 38.187% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.545, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 154.539%.

Quaker Houghton has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.67%. Century Aluminum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quaker Houghton pays 28.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Century Aluminum pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quaker Houghton's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quaker Houghton quarterly revenues are $442.9M, which are smaller than Century Aluminum quarterly revenues of $633.9M. Quaker Houghton's net income of $12.9M is lower than Century Aluminum's net income of $29.7M. Notably, Quaker Houghton's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.68x while Century Aluminum's PE ratio is 14.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quaker Houghton is 1.12x versus 0.70x for Century Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ingevity has a net margin of 2.92% compared to Quaker Houghton's net margin of 7.22%. Quaker Houghton's return on equity of 6.76% beat Ingevity's return on equity of -118.15%.

Quaker Houghton has a consensus price target of $146.00, signalling upside risk potential of 27.53%. On the other hand Ingevity has an analysts' consensus of $51.75 which suggests that it could grow by 22.46%. Given that Quaker Houghton has higher upside potential than Ingevity, analysts believe Quaker Houghton is more attractive than Ingevity.

Quaker Houghton has a beta of 1.382, which suggesting that the stock is 38.187% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ingevity has a beta of 1.386, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.613%.

Quaker Houghton has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.67%. Ingevity offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quaker Houghton pays 28.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Ingevity pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quaker Houghton's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quaker Houghton quarterly revenues are $442.9M, which are larger than Ingevity quarterly revenues of $284M. Quaker Houghton's net income of $12.9M is lower than Ingevity's net income of $20.5M. Notably, Quaker Houghton's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.68x while Ingevity's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quaker Houghton is 1.12x versus 1.14x for Ingevity. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of 2.92% compared to Quaker Houghton's net margin of --. Quaker Houghton's return on equity of 6.76% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

Quaker Houghton has a consensus price target of $146.00, signalling upside risk potential of 27.53%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of $1.40 which suggests that it could grow by 125.66%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Quaker Houghton, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Quaker Houghton.

Quaker Houghton has a beta of 1.382, which suggesting that the stock is 38.187% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.120, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.978%.

Quaker Houghton has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.67%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quaker Houghton pays 28.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quaker Houghton's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quaker Houghton quarterly revenues are $442.9M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Quaker Houghton's net income of $12.9M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$2.6M. Notably, Quaker Houghton's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.68x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quaker Houghton is 1.12x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of 2.92% compared to Quaker Houghton's net margin of --. Quaker Houghton's return on equity of 6.76% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

Quaker Houghton has a consensus price target of $146.00, signalling upside risk potential of 27.53%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 151.81%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than Quaker Houghton, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than Quaker Houghton.

Quaker Houghton has a beta of 1.382, which suggesting that the stock is 38.187% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.470, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.985%.

Quaker Houghton has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.67%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quaker Houghton pays 28.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quaker Houghton's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quaker Houghton quarterly revenues are $442.9M, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Quaker Houghton's net income of $12.9M is higher than Solitario Resources's net income of -$511K. Notably, Quaker Houghton's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.68x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quaker Houghton is 1.12x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.